It’s day four of the teachers’ strike in Chicago, and regardless of what politicians might say, negotiations aren’t near completion.
For those of you who don’t know, on Monday, Sept. 10, Chicago Public School teachers went on strike until their contract is finalized. According to abc7 news, major points of disagreement are teachers’ pay (specifically their raises), teacher benefits, whether or not the principal is required to rehire fired teachers, and the possibility of using a teacher evaluation system that relies on students’ test scores to determine which teachers get laid off.
Senior CPS student at Northside College Prep Gabbie Torralba believes that the strike is worthwhile.
“Our teachers should be receiving the respect and rewards they deserve. It’s making me see that I respect my teachers more than I really realize, and that without them, I wouldn’t be so driven to do well in school,” she said.
For me, most of these reasons are not valid enough to strike.
For instance, CPS teachers have on average either the first or second highest teacher salary (depends on if you count benefits) than any other city in America, except for perhaps New York City. The average salary of a CPS teacher is $76,000, without benefits, according to CBS2 News. Even though teachers put in a lot of work outside the classroom, at the end of the day, it is a profession that works nine months out of the year, and has many breaks throughout the school year. This seems like a fair salary.
Same thing when it comes to benefits. The CTU (Chicago Teachers’ Union) is fighting for better benefits, but if the teachers get paid well, they should be able to pay more for benefits.
Furthermore, just because a teacher got fired doesn’t mean that they deserve a new position before anyone else. It is up to the principal to decide what teachers fit the school needs the most.
However, I do agree with the CTU when they argue that the release of teachers based on students’ standardized test scores is unfair. How many times have we seen our peers take an exam and say, “I don’t care about this,” or “My mom’s making me take it,” or something along those lines? Too many to count. To hold tests accountable for judging who gets to keep their job or not is ludicrous. Not only do some stubborn students not try to perform well, but standardized test scores also reflect the economic and social status of a student. To dismiss a teacher solely based on the performance of its students on standardized tests is a ridiculous method to weave out the ‘bad’ teachers.
What makes this strike so timely and interesting is that our own D219 teachers’ union (NTFT) and school board are in the late stages of negotiating teachers’ contracts. In fact, yesterday Niles West teachers wore red to show support for the CTU. Unless topics start to be agreed upon, there is a chance for a strike at D219 schools.
When looking at the resources D219 schools have to offer, not just for students but for teachers as well, we are really fortunate. Some schools can’t conduct many chemistry labs because they can’t afford pipettes, others have very little computers, and nearly no other school has a STEM lab with equipment as high-tech as ours. In fact, some CPS buildings don’t even have air conditioning; our school is usually freezing.
Starting yesterday, Lake Forest High School is on strike, mainly for salary reasons. According to teachersalaryinfo.com, the teacher’s average salary is $68, 400.
Although a strike means no school now, it won’t sound as appealing later on. Underclassmen, and probably seniors as well, will have to make up those missed days at the end of the year, resulting in the last day of school being in mid to late June. And who wants that?
John Botonakis • Sep 20, 2012 at 9:47 AM
Why would they strike when they are obligated to teach? Why not settle this dispute in another form or maybe talk after the school day?
Alumnus • Sep 16, 2012 at 9:10 PM
Teachers at Niles West High School do not deserve more money for the education they earn to become teachers.
No other job would hire someone with a bachelor’s from some mediocre state school for $80,000.
I hesitate to call the $80,000 a yearly salary since teachers really only work 9 months each year.
Teachers who demand a higher pay should stop trying to squeeze money out of District 219 taxpayers and settle for whatever already inflated salary the administration offers.
Someone who knows better • Sep 17, 2012 at 7:48 PM
Seriously? It would be really nice if, before people commented and criticized, they checked their facts. First of all, a new teacher doesn’t make anywhere near $80,000. Second of all, how can you criticize how much teachers make when teachers, in fact, are the ones who enable everyone out there who is successful–businessmen, lawyers, doctors–and who make WAY more than the highest paid teacher–to do whatever it is they do. Come on–movie stars and basketball players are worth millions of dollars a year and the people who got them where they are and who try to give them skills and knowledge necessary to be successful aren’t worth whatever their salaries are??
doyleggir • Sep 19, 2012 at 6:03 PM
How much education a person gets is related to the amount of money they make.
The extent and rigor of most teachers’ educations simply don’t warrant 6 digit salaries. Some certainly do, particularly in district 219, but many others don’t.
The annual 4% increase that CPS teachers will earn is simply ridiculous. What happened to pay increases based on performance and merit, not simply sticking around for long enough?
The issue of athletes and movie stars is a whole other thing. They work in an industry in which consumer demand is what fuels their salaries almost entirely. If you have a problem with professional athletes making ungodly amounts of money, stop buying tickets to Yankees games–and convince millions of Americans to join you while you’re at it.
Senior • Sep 15, 2012 at 12:03 AM
You make great points. There are good reasons to strike and bad reasons to strike. Requiring teachers of basic and regular classes to meet standards is difficult when students in those classes are less driven. Striking for better pay and benefits, or even tenure–a bizarre guarantee of job security based almost entirely on seniority and not meritocracy–are bad reasons to strike.
Someone who knows better • Sep 14, 2012 at 1:55 PM
Don’t you know better than to believe everything you read/hear/watch on TV?
A • Sep 14, 2012 at 11:55 PM
Television is a pretty credible source of information.
Wonderful article, you bring up many good points regarding the lack of rationale behind recent action taken by teachers’ unions.
Sn • Sep 16, 2012 at 8:35 PM
Your comment would be much more valuable if you cited a specific place where the writer was misinformed by something she read/heard/watched on TV.
Someone who knows better • Sep 17, 2012 at 8:08 PM
How would I know from where someone got wrong information?
b • Sep 18, 2012 at 6:13 PM
by where I mean what are the factual mistakes in the article. You claim she’s misinformed; where is the misinformation?